SOVEREIGN OWNERSHIP VERSUS POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY

The coming exercise of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo under the appointed Hongkong Company has finally drafted the final position papers to be submitted to the UN member state sponsor country. Since ICJ is only accepting cases in behalf of the member state of the UN. The issue  regarding the matter of Sabah proprietary ownership. Malaysia thought all the while that by dragging the issue politically will intimidate the Leadership of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom. It is true that by  the virtue of 'Effectivites" , Malaysia has manifested the sovereign political administration of Sabah which they inherited from the British goverment when independence was granted to them in 1963. The Sipadan , Ligitan Resolution issued by the ICJ proves that no other country has demonstrated the excellent administration over the territory other than Malaysia.Under the virtue of "Effectivites" , the administrator has the right to politically administer the territory but the sovereign ownership will still hold to the proprietary owner. Malaysia being the caretaker of Sabah undoubtedly and effectively does not constitute as the 'OWNER" of the land in any circumstance. Political possession of territory  does not warrant to become approval of  Ownership to the territory. This is very clear in the Treaty of Peace between Spain and America. Spain sold the Philippines to America for USD$20 million dollars , the impression that America has own  the whole Philippines territorial land is actually wrong ,the reality was America bought the political administration only not the territorial land , that includes Visayas and Luzon as Spanish term  'Las Islas Filipinas', not including  Mindanao  because the Spanish never conquer the Sultanate Kingdom to become part of the spoil of war under the Treaty of Paris. The Treaty  of Paris specifically states that the land is still intact to the Spanish ownership and to their heirs. The whole Philippines is all under the Spanish titles prior to the sale of LaS ISLAS FILIPINAS TO AMERICA..

The question of effective political administration is not the issue but the  SOVEREIGN OWNERSHIP  is still intact to the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom.The ICJ Resolution has no prejudice that  Malaysia Nor Indonesia failed to demontrate or proove the sovereign ownership of the territory. Malaysia unanimously win in 16 to 1 vote by the virtue of " Effectivites" or in short "effective administration over the territory. This effective administration to effect is a political administration but not in any form of sovereign ownership. Taking into account the voluminous  and  solid evidences of sovereign ownership of the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah is not contestable. The Kingdom has lost the political power today to Malaysia, but the sovereign ownership over the territory still remains.The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo kingdom being in suspended animation for many decades has finally unclutched from the bondage of the succesfull political maneuver by the British and the American, by removing the political power to the once mighty kingdom of Souteast Asia.The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo armed with solid proof of ownership over the island of Sabah is now on full swing to the exercise of the proprietary ownership that Malaysia has ignored for the last 47 years

The act of delegation of the Sultanate of Sulu and North borneo leadership to the  Hongkong Company pave way to open the case wide open under private legal capacity of the Hongkong registered company. The Sultanate lost all the political power and was segregated by her perpetrators to prevent  an access to the diplomatic machinery under the United Nations of De Jure goverments for many years. This now was ended by  appointing and delegating a private company with the legal entity in Hongkong . China to pursue an international case against Malaysia or any Country member of UN can sponsor the case  to once and for all tackle the issue of the private property of the Sultanate kingdom involving Sabah and Sulu. The delegated Hongkong Company of the Sultanate Leadership has tapped all the legal luminaries as far as Europe to look into the case and file necessary Case against Malaysia where applicable under private capacity and within the scope of international law..